“When my ex-wife and I divorced, we had a hard time agreeing on the child arrangements of our two sons. We entered a family court proceeding at the end of the summer of 2014 and the situation became even more difficult and stressful for all of us. I had spoken to a number of lawyers and decided that I would appoint only a collaborative lawyer or a member of Resolution, an organization that is committed to helping people not cooperate in conflict and avoiding incendiary language to achieve results in the best interests of children. They advised that calm negotiations would get the best results, and I was hoping that my ex-wife and I could solve things that way. I had also considered trying family mediation, but the other party wrote that they did not want to go down that road. “I found it useful because it raised a number of issues that helped me take into account parenting situations and contingencies that I might not otherwise have foreseen – that`s precisely why I had to go back to court to change the court order regarding my sons in general! The parenting plan encourages you to think about situations that may arise, in which both parents must make a common decision; for example, my ex-wife and I had to talk when my eldest son chose his GCSE options. It also encourages foresight: how could the dynamics of childcare change if new partners are introduced, as in my own case? The agreement may be a temporary agreement or a permanent agreement, which is approved by a competent court. This document can help you determine: To determine issues relating to children, such as custody, visitation and assistance, a court must approve any agreement with a “Best Interests of the Child” standard. If both parents agree on this issue, a court is generally willing to include the agreement in official legal documents.
However, there is still the possibility for a court to require an adaptation of the agreement if it finds that the agreement is not in the best interests of the children concerned.