In the context of the Texan family code. “A pre-marriage contract must be signed in writing and signed by both parties. The agreement is applicable without consideration. Section 148 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, defines bailment as the supply of goods from one person to another for a specific purpose. This delivery is made on a contract which, after the completion of the objective, the goods are either returned or discarded, according to the instructions of the person delivering it. No consideration is required to honour a derailment contract.  Timko was a member of a school`s board of directors. He recommended that the school buy a building for a considerable amount of money and encourage administrators to vote for the purchase and promised to help with the purchase and, at the end of five years, pay the purchase price minus the down payment. Timko died after four years. The school continued his succession, which defended on the grounds that there was no quid pro quo for the promise.
Timko was promised or nothing was given in return, and the purchase of the building was not of direct use to him (which would have made the promise enforceable as a unilateral contract). The court ruled that Timko`s estate was held liable after Solator Estoppel`s three-way test. Estate of Timko v. Oral Roberts Evangelistic Assn., 215 N.W.2d 750 (Me. The rule of non-consideration no contract does not apply to gifts. Explanatory note (1) on Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states that the rule of a non-nullity agreement does not apply to gifts from a donor made by a donor and accepted by a company. If you accept an offer, do so as soon as possible, as it can be revoked at any time until you accept it. Once you agree, the contract is legally binding and cannot be amended or revoked. Ranganyakamma v. K S Prakash , A power of attorney was exercised by a sister who waived her right to participate in common family property for the benefit of Re 1, but out of love and affection for the brother who also authorized the brother to enter into a divisional agreement in his name. The document was written and recorded. It was bound by its promise, for it was fully covered by the exception.
Radhakrishna Joshi/ Syndikatsbank, In this case was lent to the son of the defendant under the autonomy scheme, the father executed corporate documents and admit. He was held responsible, even though he was not a guarantor. The case was considered exceptional because nature requires parents to take care of the children. There were also reflections because he bought peace from his family by saving the estate of his sons. However, a valid reflection that has been made in the past to support a promise may, in certain circumstances, form the basis of another subsequent contract. These occur when a person`s obligation to act for one reason or another has no longer become binding. If the person then makes a new promise on the basis of the unsatisfied obligation of the past, the new promise will be binding without further consideration. There are three types of cases. The seller agrees to deliver one tonne of coal within seven days. The buyer needs the coal earlier and asks the seller to deliver within four days. The seller agrees. This promise is binding, even if the seller has no additional consideration to issue beyond the purchase price of the agreed additional tax (the requirement that the coal be given to the buyer earlier than originally planned).